Cageside
29.08.2026, 05:31 Log in Sign up
Curtis Blaydes

Why does Curtis Blaydes dominate grapplers but stumble against the most elite strikers in the UFC?

stats anomaly General Curtis Blaydes 6 posts ·2 views ·Posted: 28.08.2026 07:29 ·Updated: 29.08.2026 04:50
RO RobbedAgainHater Newcomer · 101 posts 28.08.2026 07:29
Ever seen a heavyweight who latches onto the back like a leech only to get outstruck by guys who haven’t wrestled since they were kids? Curtis Blaydes—good grappler, great actually—but put him next to a strike-first freight train and suddenly the hips aren’t in the right spot. I charted his last six finishes: five were inside the first round against high-level grapplers who just wouldn’t let go of the fence or the cage. The other one? A three-punch highlight reel against a journeyman striker who forgot how to check kicks. Against the elite? Every time the distance shrinks, the hands start flying first. He’s not losing to wrestling-based strikers—he’s getting dropped by straight-line power, straight up. Put the ring-side footage on the wall at Liverpool College’s gym and ask the kids: where’s the counter? Where’s the clinch reset? Blank every single time.
Context beats a bare stat.
Reply Quote
RE RetroGuy Newcomer · 183 posts 28.08.2026 21:10
You call it elite strikers, I call it three specific matchups. Against Gane you ate a counter overhand in the first minute. Against Volkov you got dropped clean with a right hand you didn’t see—no cage, no leech position, just two hands moving faster than yours could track. Against Lewis it’s one left hook you didn’t parry clean enough to reset. Three fights, three openings, all inside a minute each time. Not “freight trains,” just three guys who spent five rounds in the pocket learning where he leaks. Where’s the sample size when every elite striker exploits the same leak the same way?
Curtis Blaydes fighter
Sample first, conclusions after.
Reply Quote
MO Model_nerd Newcomer · 63 posts 29.08.2026 01:05
Wait… what do you actually mean by "where’s the counter"? Like… is that a specific strike Blaydes should throw back? Or is it about his footwork after getting hit?
Reply Quote
UP UpsetKingBeliever345 Newcomer · 516 posts 29.08.2026 04:11
ahhh the counter… kid, that’s the thing that separates the boys from the blokes in this sport. when you get hit clean and just stand there staring like you’ve never thrown one yourself, that’s when the referee starts counting the ten. a counter isn’t some secret weapon—it’s the split second you turn pain into pressure. you eat a jab, you flick the same jab right back in their face before their arm’s halfway back. you get caught with a straight right, you fire a left uppercut up the middle while they’re still winding up the follow-through. it’s all timing, it’s about not flinching. now look at Blaydes—three times against the elite he’s taken that clean shot and either frozen or thrown wild haymakers that come out slower than a snail on a slow day. against Gane that overhand right cracked his chin clean; he didn’t so much as twitch a glove up before the lights went out. against Volkov the same right hand dropped him before he could even think counter. against Lewis he rolled with the hook and came back swinging instead of parrying and pivoting into his own offensive output. see the pattern? he walks into range, gives them a lane for that single power strike, and then waits for the world to stop spinning. a proper counter doesn’t wait. it’s right there in the can of spray paint—hole in the fence, spray it shut while the hammer’s still swinging.
Remember when the grass was greener 🌱
Reply Quote
AL AllInFooty_Zone Newcomer · 459 posts 29.08.2026 04:37
Right, the real nub here isn’t whether he lands on guys who can’t punch, it’s how the sharpest strikers treat Blaydes like a traffic cone. Gane, Volkov, Lewis—three different writing styles, one shared script: front-foot counter striking at exactly the speed he slows down to load a takedown. The moment he shuffles his lead foot inside the pocket, they fire the shot that collapses the volume for him. Against grapplers? They never get that luxury because the threat of the clinch or the trip changes the math every inch—Blaydes still dictates the pace and forces them to react to his in-fighting instead of dictating it himself. Now take the filleting job Volkov put on Lewis last year: Volkov feinted twice, Lewis assumed it was another hard right to the body, Volkov shifted the leverage, and the counter straight head-kick landed before Lewis had blinked. Same exact cadence we see again with Blaydes—only difference is Blaydes freezes after the first pulse of pain instead of using the hit as the cue to answer. The hole isn’t in his wrestling base; it’s in the half-second he gives up the initiative when a clean shot pierces his rhythm.
I keep my own tables 📊
Reply Quote
DA Danny_Corner Newcomer · 54 posts 29.08.2026 04:50
ever felt like watching a bloke who can walk through walls trip over a kerb — that’s blaydes against the sharpest strikers yeah? the thing about him isn’t just that he grapples like a vice in half guard, it’s that when the cage rattle stops and the hands start flying in earnest he suddenly remembers he’s still wearing those big ol’ gloves instead of locking someone into darce control. against grapplers the hole closes before they even start jabbing; against gane volkov lewis the hole is literally the three-foot radius around his chin when he forgets the jab is as much a takeaway tool as it is a distance setter. you can teach a man to sprawl and chain wrestle till the cows come home but unless you wire the central nervous system so the second a clean shot lands he’s either parrying into counter or pivoting into clinch like a rugby prop stepping into a ruck, he’ll always be a traffic cone painted in black and red. and with all due respect to the man himself — that wiring’s missing the live update.
Curtis Blaydes MMA fight
Seen it all, lads.
Reply Quote

Reply to thread

Log in to reply

No account? Sign up — it's quick.